Cine Cynic Header Image

ఝుమ్మంది నాదం

My introduction to Veturi began with the ETV programme ఝుమ్మంది నాదం years ago. I was so overwhelmed with his repertoire that whenever I heard an interesting song – సరళమైనవి, లోతైనవి, చిలిపివి, గమ్మత్తైనవి, అద్భుతమైన భూతులున్నవి  – whose writer I didn’t know, I attributed it to him. I still do and I might continue to for songs written long after his death. It might be because even though he may have not written those songs, it seemed that he could easily have written them with his other hand while attending another mind-numbing awards ceremony.

After his recent death, I listened to a number of his songs hoping to transcribe another of those. I finally settled with ఝుమ్మంది నాదం itself. The music director with the first sound of percussion sends a wave through the legs, and by the time it climbs up the body the lyricist with his first word sets the heart aflutter.

I don’t understand the lyrics completely, but that never hindered my pulse from rising and my mind from dancing beside Jaya Prada and Chandra Mohan. I don’t think the picturization could capture as jubilantly as the words did the resonance of the atmospheric phenomena with the emotions inside the mute protagonist’s heart. ఎల తేటి రొద probably means the sounds in a tender coconut; I don’t know what లెస in కలిత కవిత లెస and విరుపు in నీ మేని విరుపు exactly mean.

చిత్రం: కె విశ్వనాథ్ గారి సిరి సిరి మువ్వ (1977)
రాసినది: వేటూరి సుందరరామ మూర్తి
కూర్చినది: కె వి మహదెవన్
పాడినది: ఎస్ పి బాలసుబ్రహ్మణ్యం, పి సుశీల

ఝుమ్మంది నాదం సయ్యంది పాదం
తనువూగింది ఈ వేళ
చెలరేగింది ఒక రాసలీల

యెదలోని సొదలా ఎల తేటి రొదలా
కదిలేటి నదిలా కలల వరదలా
చలిత లలిత పద కలిత కవిత లెస
సరిగమ పలికించగా
స్వరమధురిమ లొలికించగా
సిరిసిరి మువ్వలు పులకించగా

నటరాజ ప్రేయసి నటనాల ఊర్వసి
నటియించు నీవని తెలిసి
ఆకాశమై పొంగె ఆవేశం
కైలాసమే వంగె నీకోసం

మెరుపుంది నాలో; అది నీ మేని విరుపు
ఉరుముంది నాలో; అది నీ మువ్వ పిలుపు
చినుకు చినుకులో చిందు లయలతో
కురిసింది తొలకరి జల్లు
విరిసింది అందాల హరివిల్లు
ఈ పొంగులే ఏడు రంగులుగా

chitram: ke viSwanAth gAri siri siri muvva (1977)
rAsinadi: vETUri sundararAma mUrti
kUrchinadi: ke vi mahadevan
pADinadi: es pi bAlasubrahmaNyam, pi suSIla

jhummandi nAdam sayyandi pAdam
tanuvUgindi I vELa
chelarEgindi oka rAsalIla

yedalOni sodalA ela tETi rodalA
kadilETi nadilA kalala varadalA
chalita lalita pada kalita kavita lesa
sarigama palikinchagA
svaramadhurima lolikinchagA
sirisiri muvvalu pulakinchagA

naTarAja prEyasi naTanAla Urvasi
naTiyinchu nIvani telisi
aakASamai ponge AvESam
kailAsamE vange nIkOsam

merupundi nAlO; adi nI mEni virupu
urumundi nAlO; adi nI muvva pilupu
chinuku chinukulO chindu layalatO
kurisindi tolakari jallu
virisindi andAla harivillu
I pongulE EDu rangulugA

Remember Me, Remember Marcel Proust

This Friday evening a friend who wanted to get out of the office told me that he hadn’t been to a theatre in a long time. Actually I haven’t been to a theatre in a long time and he hasn’t been to one in a very long time. We decided to watch some movie, any movie. Jon Favreau’s Iron Man 2 couldn’t be the one for various reasons – I watched it this morning – and after striking through every other movie playing in the nearest multiplex I stumbled upon Allen Coulter’s Remember Me. The title was desperate enough to match our impulsive neediness, and I vaguely remembered Roger Ebert’s review.

The hour-long schmooze before the delayed start and the three-hour-long drunk confessions after it overshadow the movie, but they didn’t need to. I wouldn’t anyway remember anything about the movie apart from its title. The good thing about the movie is that it is mediocre enough to shove me out of my slumber and tempt me to at least show the snarkier side of me. Though being snarky is my first nature, as I show every now and then, it is hardly satisfying being so for an insignificant movie that no one would remember. I am going to try something “different”, as we Indians – filmmakers and moviegoers – like to say.

Within a few minutes of the movie I got bored enough to embark on my own journey making vague references from any given scene. It was largely a purposeless and unconscious act of recalling recent movies and books through Remember Me. Being a fan of Marcel Proust’s Remembrances of Things Past (which I haven’t read) and of the concept of involuntary memory, I found the exercise engrossing enough.

Update: Below is only a list of several things that I remembered, and not a description of any of the memories corresponding to them. This makes it boring. It makes sense to delete the post, but I’m tempted to preserve it for posterity. If it stirs any of your own memories, that may give this a little more value.

When the opening scene was set in 1991 and the next scene in 2001 I remembered the many anachronisms that commonly feature in the Goofs section of IMDB.

During the introductory scene of Robert Pattinson several girls sitting beside me gasped in delight on seeing his face. When he bent across a bed to reach for the phone his pajamas fell below the hips. I remembered all the metrosexuals consciously buying low waist jeans to ostentatiously wear and unconsciously walk around in them. Once I saw his face clearly I wondered whether he looked paler in the Twilight series and I couldn’t remember how he looked as Cedric Diggory. Most of all I remembered the year-old interview in which Stephen King declared that Stephenie Meyer couldn’t write worth a darn.

When I saw Lena Olin in the next scene I remembered her tattoo in Roman Polanski’s The Ninth Gate. I was saddened to see how much older she has become in a decade and remembered Kamal Hasan in Gautham Menon’s Raghavan. Later when it was mentioned that her character is a social service worker she reminded me of Urmila Matondkar in Jahnu Barua’s Maine Gandhi Ko Nahin Mara.

During the post-funeral scene when all members pieces of the Hawkins family sat at a table, I remembered JD Salinger’s Catch in the Rye. When it was clear that the only person Tyler cared for was his sister Caroline, the image grew more intense. I quickly wrote off Tyler as the real empty phony, but continued to think of little Phoebe Caulfield whenever Caroline entered a scene. I also remembered Coraline, which I’ve neither read nor watched. (After watching the entire movie, I wish it had been about Caroline Hawkins, about her loneliness and “freakishness” and her way of dealing with the tragedies in her fragile life, because that character had a vivid story arc and because Ruby Jerins can act.)

During the classroom discussion in a Global Politics class about morals and ethics in the recent wake of terrorism (2001, before Sep 11th) I remembered the classroom discussion about the nature of fantasies in a Philosophy class in Alan Parker’s The Life of David Gale. I wondered why there is hardly ever a second discussion in a similar setting in such movies.

When I heard Steven Soderbergh’s Erin Brockovich coming from the Craigs’ TV, I was sure that Sgt. Craig must have had a better time watching that movie than I would watching this one and than Ally would with Tyler on their first date.

When Ally started getting intimate with Tyler, I wondered why and how many girls fall for the damaged types. I invariably remembered Dr. Lisa Cuddy, Dr. Allison Cameron and Stacy Warner, and winked at Dr. Gregory House. Of course, Tyler only resembles a violent vampire eternally sucked by teenage angst. Later, whenever Ally looked happily in love with Tyler, immediately after his displays of anger, I was reminded of the few such women I’ve heard about in real life and felt sorry for them.

When I saw Chris Cooper sulking alone in his apartment as Sgt. Craig, I remembered his several lonesome characters like in Sam Mendes’ American Beauty and Billy Ray’s Breach, and realized that I’ve never seen him play an upbeat character.

When the interval began I remembered an old Little Hearts advertisement. Reporter: “Which part of the movie did you like the most?” Moviegoer: “Intruvall.”

When Caroline was shading a drawing with a pencil while talking to her brother’s new girlfriend the soft scratching reminded me of couples rocking on beds, and then the scene where young Forrest Gump sits on the front yard listening to the sounds coming out of the room with Mrs. Gump and the principal inside, and inevitably of the subsequent grunts that the boy himself makes.

Pierce Brosnan showed a paunch in the movie. I don’t know whether it was a prosthetic, but the word (and he himself) reminded me of his panache, more as Thomas Crown than as James Bond. When Charles Hawkins missed his daughter’s art gallery exhibition, I imagined the irony of his Thomas Crown character enamored by Claude Monet. When he finally took Caroline to the museum, I remembered James Stewart looking dazed in Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo. When he argued with Tyler and Ally that some Yankee team member was not fat but only big-boned, I may have laughed louder and longer than anybody else in the theatre, thinking about Eric Cartman’s claim that he was not fat but big-boned and Stanley Marsh’s retort that Jay Leno’s chin was big-boned and that Cartman was a big fat ass. When the family album scrolled on Charles’ office desktop, I remembered Brosnan’s deceased first wife and their three sons. (The word ‘deceased’ is used in the movie once, by Chris Cooper.) When Tyler told Ally that he came from a family of Irish musicians, I wished that they had kept the Irish accent of Pierce Brosnan. The Irish connection sprang several other memories like its great works of literature (I recently completed James Joyce’ Dubliners. Involuntary memories play a significant role in his works like Dubliners and Ulysses.), the current golden age of Irish crime, the beautiful Irish accents, of how Meryl Streep disappointed me with her accent in Pat O’Connor’s Dancing at Lughnasa, and of the Magdalene Asylums.

During the scene in which Tyler was sitting in a theatre, apparently wondering why he is sitting there, I empathized with him. (Or did the director empathize with the audience?) I remembered another recent mirroring of the character in a movie with the audience, in a scene in James Cameron’s Avatar.

Towards the end of the movie, I remembered that namedropping books and writers was regular early on in the movie and quickly died down. Rereading this very post, I realized that it may have been for the best.

When one of the main characters died at the end of the movie, I thought not about Ramesh Sippy’s Sholay, but about K Balachander’s antulEni katha and Mark Rydell’s Intersection. I have been particularly impressed by the latter movie (which I never saw completely), where the death of a character significantly alters the outcome of the movie, and it was not how the character died but under what circumstances the character died that made a difference. After thinking for a long time I also remembered VN Aditya. In all his movies that I’ve seen he gets the hero or heroine stabbed and then promptly recovered, and it felt insignificant in all of those movies. In Remember Me as well, the death is in the Sep 11 attacks. “What a croc of shit!” I thought, and remembered the wonderful monologue in Martin Brest’s Scent of a Woman. It would’ve made no difference had that character died of dysentery (like in Clint Eastwood’s Letters From Iwo Jima), for the aftermath is only a montage of closed ones dealing with the death in due course of time. This also reminded me that I haven’t yet read any Sep 11 literature, and decided that John Updike’s Terrorist should be an especially good choice.

After walking out of the theatre I remembered that I seldom watch movies about teen angst as I can neither appreciate it nor tolerate it. This movie actually doesn’t fall under teen angst, for neither of the main romantic pair is a teen (both are college students), but the movie seems targeted on teens.

Amazon Ads:

PIFF 2010: About the Bestiality in Man

I was driving home one night. I stopped at a red signal, still thinking furiously about the movie that I had just watched. There was a long queue growing with cars coming out of the multiplex that I had driven out of. The driver in the car behind me got impatient and started honking. I tried not to let it bother me. The signal time was unusually short. I could see him in the rearview mirror, honking relentlessly, with his wife beside him. I pulled up the window glasses but my ears could still feel the blaring horn. Did he think that I was a retard who couldn’t tell red from green? It got on my nerves. I wanted to step out of my car, walk to his, and bang his head against the steering again and again while viciously looking into the eyes of his wife. I was scared. I turned up the stereo and clenched my fists around the steering.

I felt the constant presence of the movie at the back of my mind for the next couple of days. I felt its presence when I read about another bombing. I felt its presence when I encountered a reckless salesman in an electronics store. I felt its presence when I was chopping vegetables with the knife. A few days later when I sat down in front of the laptop to write about the movie, I quickly skipped it after a little pondering and instead watched a rerun of South Park to distract my thoughts.

Among all the movies that I watched during PIFF 2010, Dominic Murphy’s White Lightnin’ is the one that haunted me the most. It is in black and white. It is probably the movie that haunted me more intensely than any other ever. I hoped that I would be able to write about it some day. It took me this long. I wasn’t processing it all along. I was only stalling.

White Lightnin’ is a movie based on the life of legendary “dancing outlaw” Jesco White. It opens with young Jesco huffing – glue, paint, gas, booze, anything with a distinct odour – and living through phantasmagorical nightmares and horrifying fantasies. A few minutes into the movie, he has already snuffed coke and too many other things, fought with too many kids, been to the juvenile prison too many times, and spent a good deal of his life in a mental asylum. Jesco lives with his large redneck family, including his famous father Donald Ray, in the Appalachian Mountains of West Virginia. All his escapades are despite his father’s desperate attempts at thwarting them (which to me seemed weak), and the only thing that brings him sanity is when his father teaches him mountain dancing.

The father gets murdered in a gruesome manner, and this greatly worsens the already sensitive psyche of Jesco. It is an event that haunts him for the rest of his life. The doctor tells his mother that he will never be able to live without someone looking after him.

Within the first twenty minutes, while Jesco is having a meal in the asylum dormitory another ward show

. I don’t intend to gross you out, but only warn you of the extremely graphic nature of the movie. I will be glad for all those who walk out by then, for it only gets worse in Jesco’s life. I must confess that at no point did I wish to leave, and am glad to have watched the entire movie.

I won’t tell you more about what happens. It might come across as only a spiral of violence which you must have realized by now anyway. While detractors may look at the movie as an ill-connected string of one gratuitously violent scene after another, that they all happen throughout a single man’s life, and that they are shown along with the rest of the events through his perspective make a great difference. There may be many lives like this, but this one is his.

Jesco is a character with surplus energy, an energy that is very well conveyed by the music and sound effects. He never finds a reliable way of releasing it regularly. He is content while mountain dancing on an eight by four piece of plywood while wearing his father’s shoes. He is on the edge of sanity while partying with his crazy girl. He has a slippery switch in his dark grey matter. It goes on without his consent, and then all hell breaks loose. He is aware of that switch. He struggles to find it, to control it, and finally to remove it. He gets increasingly religious. He quotes the Bible. He solders fine religious woodburnings. But something elusive keeps stepping on that insidious switch. As I saw him oscillating between hope and madness, I was acutely aware of my own ignorance of that chaos and the emptiness of my empathy.

It is a bold script by Eddy Moretti and Shane Smith. I guess it comes with the territory for someone who founded the Vice magazine. The movie works because of the excellent performance by Edward Hogg who gets under the skin of Jesco White with his big expressive eyes. Clearly the movie has been overlooked. I hope that at least the fans of Carrie Fisher will be tempted to give it a try. When Edward Hogg becomes the star that many are hoping he would, the movie might get a few more patrons. I see the movie as a rare thorough (and necessary) documentation of violence through the eyes of an anguished perpetrator.

I read all I could about Jesco White, including a fine essay by Jeff Stover and a fan’s day out with him. He is very much alive, and very much seems to be the character that he was portrayed as. The eighteen-year-old documentary “Dancing Outlaw” must have helped as well. I can’t find the resources that I’ve previously read, but I remember reading that Jesco White himself helped while writing the script. As a man who truly struggled (struggles) with depression, addiction and other “distorders”, I wonder if most of the events in the movie are his attempt at exorcizing the demons in his head.

Image Source: Amazon

Amazon Ads:

Soniaji ki Second Shaadi

While fretting over some stupid business since a fortnight, I grossly neglected significant issues of national importance. The current one apparently is made up of headlines with Modi and Tharoor’s names and a voluptuous model’s pin-ups. I am yet to catch up with that, but an acquaintance this afternoon summarized briefly the current concluding issue about apnI deSkI bETIkI shAdI.

As the acquaintance so subtly put it, “<long beep>, isko IndiasE nikAldenA hain”. People joined both sides and a lukewarm debate ensued, and even though I never benefited from her forehand strokes I took to her defence. I have offended some people during the debate, and as always it gave me immense pleasure.

Here is a biased MOM briefly describing a few points discussed:

1. She’s what she is because of India.
A. Is it? Because India apparently paid for her success and fortune, at least after she won the 2003 Wimbledon Championships Girl’s Doubles title? Keep it aside for a moment. Take yourself, a person who somehow found a decent job. Your company pays your salary, which is most of the money or fortune you make, which is the means of your (and maybe your family’s) prosperity. It also occasionally pays for your “career development”. Are you what you are because of your company, and even if you were does it give your company to dictate your choices? What she and “India” have is mostly a business relationship, which has so far been acceptable for both parties.

2. Couldn’t she find one deserving man from all of India?
A. People in love, people who get married, etc. don’t do an exhaustive search of the universal set. They come across a person, hopefully find that person interesting (depending on factors like money, looks, sensitivity, sense of humor, intelligence, cup sizes, penile lengths and other strengths), tell themselves and anybody who listens to them that they have found the person they have been looking for, and get together. It doesn’t mean that they have done an exhaustive search, which is unrealistic and something most people wouldn’t want to do. It doesn’t mean that the rest of the population is undeserving, and for that matter the word “deserving” here is meaningless on the grounds that it is undefinable or at least remains undefined. It also doesn’t mean that they have found the person they have been looking for, but I’m digressing.

3. It’s okay with anybody except a Pakistani.
A. Oh! you are the one to decide who all it is “okay” with for someone you haven’t met nor have any interest beyond her short skirts and navel rings? And imagine injecting that clause “except a Pakistani” into a villain’s dialogue in a movie of national integration. How have you felt then? It may be nothing more than a movie, and you are nothing more than an Indian Pakistani-hating stereotype. I read a definition this morning. One-shot case study, n.: The scientific equivalent of the four-leaf clover, from which it is concluded that all clovers possess four leaves and are sometimes green.

4. It is not her individual preference because she’s a celebrity.
A. On the contrary, being a celebrity gives a person more strength to exercise individual preference, at the cost of some sacrifices. What is the use of gaining that power if one doesn’t exercise it? Celebrity or not, which hole a person lives in and which hole a person plugs his or her tools into is nobody’s business except the person’s and the hole’s owner’s. On the other hand, a celebrity running over pedestrians may be an individual preference but as it violates the pedestrians’ preference it is to be condemned, at least discouraged.

5. India needs a sports icon. What if she gets pressurised from his side to start playing for Pakistan?
A. a) I don’t understand the need for sports icons, and recommend you to read this counterpoint. b) See image below and also try the exercise by yourself. I’m glad that wiki is at least ranked 7th among the search suggestions, and I hope you see the point about the nature of people’s interest in that sports icon. I speculate that more Indians may have downloaded her wallpapers than have watched her Tennis matches.

Sania Mirza on Google Search

6. If she were from Pakistan and he from India, the Pakistanis would have massacred both families.
A. I read a definition this morning, and I already mentioned it above. Also, somebody doing something irrational doesn’t mean that you should join them. Nevertheless, I understand the temptation.

7. India gives so many benefits to its citizens.
A. Pray tell, what exactly are those benefits? And how do they compare with other countries? There is nothing wrong for a person to move to a country which appears more beneficial. It is not very different from people shifting houses.

8. Tell me anything but my conscience just cannot accept it.
A. You will get over it. You may continue to live irrationally, but a lot of people including yours truly live that way, and die largely of natural causes.

9. What about the woman who got cheated and divorced?
A. One valid question, for the whole issue doesn’t seem to me of national importance but more of an alleged fraud. You tell me. I know nothing about the case. If she got cheated, it appears that it isn’t the celebrity in question but her husband who may have cheated her. If there has been a divorce, I am guessing there was some settlement. Whatever, I sincerely hope that the fat lady got justice.

show

Spreading Joy Through Reading

Cross-posted on I. Updated with information about modes of donation and contacts.

Akshar Bharati is an NGO with a beautiful aim: opening libraries for under-privileged children. Since its inception 3 years ago it has opened nearly 200 libraries across 6 states. That is a great achievement for an organization in which there is only one full-time activist and rest are all volunteers. As an awarness and fund raising campaign, it is organizing a musical night by Avdhoot Gupte on 18th April, 2010 at VIT College, Pune.

If you see the irony in a book-centric organization holding a music-centric event you should realize that we adults want very little to do with books ourselves though we want children to read more. Imagine a joyless event like a three-hour-long public book-reading session and you will agree that we are more likely to want to be paid in such a scenario, not the other way round.

As an occasional volunteer, it is imperative that I implore you to buy donation passes (worth 300, 500 and 1000 INR) or give donations or sign up as volunteers. Those are all inclusive ors. Interested folks can call me if you have my number, contact me (cinecynic AT gmail DOT com), or post a comment below. All donations come under Income Tax, 80G exemption and are eligible for programs like matching grants in several corporations.

Spread the word about spreading joy through reading.

UPDATE

Donations: The online payment gateway system is not yet on because Akshar Bharati is still waiting for the government approval. Donations of all amounts are accepted in the form of cheques (pay “Sewa International”). Library adoption costs: primary (10000 INR), secondary (12000 INR), complete library (22000 INR).

Office: Akshar Bharati, Sewa Sahayog, Flat #7, Shreya Apartment, Near Swanand Hospital, Deep Bungalow Chowk, Shivajinagar, Pune – 411016.

Contact: Kailas Narawade (+91-9604533919), info AT aksharbharati DOT org.